Home / Reference / Copper vs Aluminum Conductors

Copper vs Aluminum Conductors

Aluminum carries about 61% more resistance per size than copper — here is what that means for sizing, terminations and cost.

SizeCu Ω/kftAl Ω/kftAl/Cu ratioAl size to match Cu
12 AWG1.933.181.65×8 AWG
10 AWG1.2121.65×6 AWG
8 AWG0.7641.261.65×4 AWG
6 AWG0.4910.8081.65×3 AWG
4 AWG0.3080.5081.65×1 AWG
3 AWG0.2450.4031.64×1/0 AWG
2 AWG0.1940.3191.64×2/0 AWG
1 AWG0.1540.2531.64×3/0 AWG
1/0 AWG0.1220.2011.65×4/0 AWG
2/0 AWG0.09670.1591.64×250 kcmil
3/0 AWG0.07660.1261.64×300 kcmil
4/0 AWG0.06080.11.64×350 kcmil
250 kcmil0.05150.08471.64×500 kcmil
300 kcmil0.04290.07071.65×500 kcmil
350 kcmil0.03670.06051.65×
400 kcmil0.03210.05291.65×
500 kcmil0.02580.04241.64×

When aluminum wins

Aluminum costs a fraction of copper per pound and weighs 30% of copper per unit volume, so for large feeders — services, subpanel feeds, anything 1/0 and up — aluminum two sizes larger is usually cheaper, lighter and entirely code-compliant. Modern AA-8000 series alloy with anti-oxidant compound and properly torqued AL-rated lugs has none of the reputation problems of 1960s branch-circuit aluminum.

When copper wins

Branch circuits (15–30 A) are effectively copper territory — aluminum smaller than 12 AWG is not listed, device terminations are CU-only, and the size penalty erases the savings. Copper also tolerates more termination abuse and fits smaller conduit for the same ampacity.

Run both materials through the wire size solver and the energy loss calculator to compare lifetime cost, not just purchase price.

Built & maintained by Murugan Vellaichamy · Every calculation verified against NEC Chapter 9 Table 8 & Table 310.16 published values · Informational reference — not engineering advice